Publication: On Raphael Lemkin

My latest article is less of a research piece and more of a series of complaints.  In fact, it serves as a reflection on the frustrations that arise when trying to navigate through the murky waters of historical accuracy and representation. It is an exploration of the challenges faced by historians when dealing with figures whose life stories are not only complex but also riddled with inconsistencies that have been perpetuated over time.

I wrote a short article on Raphael Lemkin’s early career in Poland, attempting to correct a few fundamental misunderstandings that have been widely accepted in various academic circles. Lemkin was a international criminal lawyer, best known for coining the term "genocide." But despite this major contribution to humanity, he had a habit of fibbing about his life and work, making it particularly difficult for historians to answer some basic questions about his motivations, influences, and the context in which he operated.

In my article, I delve into specific instances where Lemkin's accounts diverge from documented evidence, highlighting how these discrepancies can lead to misinterpretations of his intentions and the significance of his work. For example, I discuss his early education and the political climate in Poland at the time, which shaped his views on law and human rights. By examining primary sources and comparing them with Lemkin's own writings, I aim to shed light on the complexities of his character and the historical context that influenced his groundbreaking ideas.

Open access!